2024 December 20 • Friday

James Glickenhaus built on The Soldier's Meta Marquee moment in his next movie, 1988's Shakedown.

When we first meet the cop played by Sam Elliott, he's waking up during a movie in Times Square movie theatre, and it's actually the ski chase with Uzis scene from The Soldier! So he wakes up for the best part!

Then Peter Weller's defense attorney character finds him to talk about the case he's working on, and we see them with posters for both The Exterminator and The Soldier, then follow them outside to see both movies on the marquee, indicating that a Glickenhaus double feature is on!

Also intriguing is that Peter Weller's character is named Dalton and the very next year Sam Elliot would partner up with Patrick Swayze in Road House, and Swayze's character is also named Dalton!

You can call it a coincidence if you want.


2024 December 18 • Wednesday

James Glickenhaus has been a featured filmmaker at Gutbrain headquarters recently. And his 1982 movie The Soldier contains a quintessential Meta Marquee moment. This scene in Times Square shows his previous movie, The Exterminator, is playing.


2024 December 16 • Monday

Happy birthday!

Death Wish was a hit so you know what happened next. But Death Wish II relocates Charles Bronson from NYC to LA. Big difference. The music should be different too. Jimmy Page is perhaps as different from Herbie Hancock as LA is from NYC so… the 835th Soundtrack of the Week, is Jimmy Page's music for Death Wish II!

There's an impressive range of material on here and it's all good enough to wish that Page had done more soundtrack work. (He does Death Wish III as well, using some of the same themes.)

While Hancock's score for the movie had a sort of jazz/funk/Latin thread running through it, Page opts for blues rock as the musical center for the second movie. The first track is the full strength versionm "Who's To Blame", with vocals by Chris Falowe and guitar and guitar synth soloing by Page.

Some odd sounds and effective use of space distinguish the first half of "The Chase", which hints at bluesy roots by indulging them in short bursts among more unsettling clusters of sparsely scored sections. Then there's a more standard string section followed by a suspenseful and textural conclusion.

"City Sirens" is another really good blues rock number with a catchy descending vocal line and, naturally, great guitar playing.

Then there's a monster blues rock stomp instrumental in "Jam Sandwich" that could easily have been slipped into a Led Zeppelin song.

The sensitive ballad requirement is easily fulfilled by "Carole's Theme", which blends piano, strings and acoustic guitar for a lovely and serene piece.

Tense "crime" writing for strings kicks off "The Release" but is soon supplanted by Page's signature guitar playing and the rock rhythm section taking us into another rock instrumental, not so much bluesy this time but almost hinting at Iron Maiden-style guitar lines.

A woozy electric bass sound occupies the center of "Hotel Rats and Photostats", which also has some nice synth touches. This feeling of suspension in space with interesting tones and textures floating in and out continues with different colors and feels in "A Shadow in the City", with Page alternating between electric guitar harmonics and guitar synth.

"Jill's Theme" is an urgently tragic cue for one of the movie's lowest points, followed by a space rock version of a Chopin prelude for "Prelude".

Then it's time to rock again for the big and loud "Big Band, Sax, and Violence", another vocal number. Then it's another slab of intense instrumental rock for "Hypnotizing Ways (Oh Mamma)".

This expanded edition of the soundtrack also has some alternates and different arrangements as well as some extra diegetic music, such as the country rock song "Country Sandwich" as well as a beautiful multi-guitar tune called "A Mirror Sketch".


2024 December 13 • Friday

Brian Garfield was reportedly not thrilled with the simplistic adaptation of his novel Death Wish. If he saw any of the sequels, he must have really hated them.

Before that could happen, he wrote his own sequel. Lacking the the imagination for a title like Death Wish 2, he called it Death Sentence.

This one finds Paul Benjamin in Chicago, not really trying to start a new life but continue his old life in a different city. He still goes out hunting for criminals to kill and he still feels fearful and nauseous, with sweaty hands, every time.

Of course Chicago offers plenty of opportunities. Once Paul's activities become news, other citizens start to arm themselves and strike back. And then there's a copy-cat vigilante, another lone gunman like Paul, operating on a parallel track. The police don't know if it's a second vigilante or one vigilante with two different guns, but Paul knows.

Garfield alternates extremely effective writing from Paul's point of view with less convincing expository sections that are presented as newspaper articles nad TV news broadcasts.

There's a love interest, a woman who works as a prosecutor for the DA's office. Also in the mix is her mentor, a retired law professor who has strong opinions about the justice system. Both of these characters allow Garfield to shoe-horn some political philosophizing into the book but the real story is violence as a kind of infectious disease with Paul as one of many carriers.

While his actions aren't portrayed as a positive example to follow, the environment itself is, as it was in the Death Wish, a hellish, hopeless jungle of near constant brutality and sadism. When Paul is tagged quite accurately as demonstrating "violent solipsism" the phrase describes a social problem as much as it describes the individual.

It's a well written and page-turning thriller, much better than the movies Garfield's work spawned.

The first line is "The guns pointed in every direction".


2024 December 11 • Wednesday

Happy birthday!

Death Wish has rooted itself deeply enough into our cultural consciousness that most people will be pretty confident that they know what it's about. And they'll probably mostly be right.

Brian Garfield's original novel deserves more attention than it's received, though.

It's a nimble piece of writing, a study in character first and a thriller second. Garfield is a virtuoso of understatement and economy and can grab readers and pull them in with ease.

Let's get some of the differences between the book and the movie out of the way first. In the book, the main character is a Jewish man named Paul Benjamin, a conventional, middle class, comfortable sort of person, liberal to the extent that he has an opinion about anything: "had never supported Zionism or the Temple of the B'nai Brith".

At his wife's funeral, the rabbi's "remarks were dutiful and innocuous". Those are the words to describe Paul as well.

His wife has been killed and his daughter traumatized to the point of being unable to return to life with other people after three young men, apparently looking for drug money, force their way into Paul's apartment. Esther and Carol don't have more than a few dollars on them and so they become human punching bags for their attackers, who you might think were enraged or desperate but are described as laughing hysterically, so perhaps high and/or insane.

One big difference between book and movie is that this happens off-page in the book. We are not an audience for this scene of brutality. Another big difference is that in the book there isn't anything sexual about what happens. It's explicitly stated that nothing like rape occurs, just beating. It's just inhuman and senseless violence that apparently means nothing to its perpetrators.

The senselessness of it makes it especially horrific to everyone affected. In the movie, of course, the assault is right there for everyone to see and it includes sexual assault, in a sharp departure from the book. And while the three assailants are described in the book as Peurto Rican and/or black—like all of Paul Benjamin's eventual targets—the movie gives us three Caucasian attackers, of whom one is Jeff Goldblum.

The filmmakers were wise not to make this a story about a white man blowing away a bunch of non-white criminals. The book uses this dynamic to show us a prejudiced and unfair world that celebrates Paul's violence. The police end up being solidly on his side, which leads to the novel's powerful and chilling conclusion. The movie is rather limp in comparison, showing explicit sexual violence that simply isn't in the book but shying away from uncomfortable ideas, of all things.

When Paul's son-in-law, who significantly works for Legal Aid, tells Paul that he has to go on living, Paul disagrees. And Paul doesn't go on living. "Paul" is dead (a Beatles reference?) and a new Paul will take his place.

His lowered head swung back and forth like the head of a worn-out prelim fighter in the ring, trying to locate his opponent. "I'm not thinking about suicide, I didn't mean that." But he kept bulling it, thinking. His breathing was shallow; his sphincter contracted, he formed a loose fist. "I've never hit a man in anger in my life. Never called a black man 'nigger' or stolen a penny from any man. I've given money and my own time to a dozen worthwhile causes from block associations to the N-Double-A-C-P."

And that's a pretty clear description. Paul has been thrown into the ring, he has no experience and he's getting clobbered. His whole self is reacting and he's forming "a loose fist". The first will get less loose.

Garfield's book tracks how Paul Benjamin becomes, in his own way, the same species as the maniacs who kill his wife and shatter his daughter's sanity. Or perhaps it's better to say that he starts living in the same jungle as them, he becomes a predator instead of prey. And, crucially, part of the transformation involves the rush of both sex and drugs as well as the addictive properties of both.

Garfield signals this direction early on, when Paul interacts with a black police officer in the emergency room. This cop has seen it all, he lives and works in this hell, but he's kind and considerate. But he's got a gun, hasn't he?

After a while—he wasn't reckoning time—the cop got to his feet clumsily, rattling the heavy accoutrements that hung like sinkers from his uniform belt. The thick handle of the revolver moved to Paul's eye level.

There it is. But the cops are literally weighed down and clumsy, sinking beneath the weight of their requirements. Paul won't have that problem.

In the book he's an accountant and in the movie he's an architect. And of course in the movie he's Charles Bronson. Which means that Paul Kersey (as he's called in the movie) is already kind of up to the task becayse he's Charles Bronson. While the Paul in the book has to learn how to fire a gun because he's never done it before, in the movie he grew up with guns and already knows everything about them and is a great shot.

Which is actually kind of boring.

Garfield slips into the second person often—"You preserved a modicum of sanity only because there were so many idiotic decisions you had to make"—effectively allowing readers to see through Paul's eyes.

The book also functions as a deft social satire at times and is only really bogged down by a long section that's a presentation of an article from a magazine about the vigilante's motives. I had to imagine Garfield's editor demanding that he tell his readers what they're supposed to think about what's been happening, even though the writing is very clear and sensitive.

Death Wish is a book about a character rather than an abstraction like "vigilantism". This is a character who has experiences that change who he is and what he does as a result. This radiates outwards to change those who experience the things that he does, either directly or vicariously, thus causing a ripple in this particular social pool.

The movie aims more for conventional exploitation goals and reaches them. The draw of a Charles Bronson movie is action more than character and that suits most people just fine.

The book is worth a look, though.

The first line is "Later he worked out where he had been at the time of the attack on Esther and Carol".


2024 December 09 • Monday

The 834th Soundtrack of the Week, is Death Wish by the great Herbie Hancock.

The main title theme here is a stretched out and laidback groove number with strings, wah-wah guitar and electric piano and synth jamming in a cool and sometimes spacey way.

"Joanna's Theme" is a love theme, like you'd expect, but it's unusually intense, with the twinkling piano operating at a faster tempo and with more energy than you'd expect. The bass line is also similar to that from the main title, perhaps to remind you not to get too comfortable.

The beginning of the assault is accompanied by the tense and often dissonant "Do a Thing", a feature mostly for piano and strings. Then snare and percussion start off the crescendo to violence in "Paint Her Mouth", which has a lot of space and unsettling sonorities from strings and electronics.

The contrast between the wide open spaces of the southwestern US with the stifling and scary concrete jungle of NYC is brought to life by the country-tinged and airy "Rich Country".

Then there's a long suite of "Revenge" music: "Suite Revenge: a) Striking Back, b) Riverside Park, c) The Alley, d) Last Stop, e) 8th Avenue Station". It starts out as modern chamber music, develops into more conventional dramatic underscore for a larger ensemble which is eventually replaced by a percussion-driven groove freak out before concluding with a sort of minimalist not quite funk cue that features bass clarinet.

"Ochoa Kknose" starts with flute and piano, very gently, somewhat reminiscent of Lalo Schifrin before Hancock brings in woodwinds and strings and percussion, directing the listener to the sonic location of the story.

You might expect "Party People" to be some rocking diegetic music for a party scene, and maybe for just a few seconds it is, but mostly it's a thoughtful, melancholy and restrained piece for strings and percussion that has an eerie and ethereal feel to it.

The album wraps up with the most intense and funky piece, the post-jazz, electric Miles-influenced rock-funk-whatever of "Fill Your Hand", an extended feature for electric piano and synth and a superb piece.


2024 December 06 • Friday

Columbo started strong. Following a TV movie and a pilot episode, both excellent, the series proper started with an incredibly high quality episode, "Murder by the Book", which was directed by a young Stephen Spielberg.

None of which matters right now. No spoilers, but crucial to the plot of this episode is the series of detective novels created by characters in the show. It's the "Mrs. Melville" series and you can see several of the books in this shot here.

Got it?

On that shelf there are five copies of Mrs. Melville in London. On the top shelf three of them are the second, ninth and fourteenth books from the left-hand side.

It's not a great screenshot, I know, but you can see it clearly enough.

What about these?

They're also bad screenshots but it's definitely the same book. But this copy of Mrs. Melville in London is on the bookshelf in Jim Rockford's trailer in the Rockford Files episode "Rattlers' Class of '63"!

Interestingly, this entry in a fictional detective series is sharing one of Jim Rockford's shelves with an entry in a real-life detective series: Strike Out Where Not Applicable, one of Nicolas Freeling's Inspector Van der Valk novels.

But the real story is that this establishes that Lt. Columbo and Jim Rockford exist in the same television universe! It would be easy to imagine them running into each other at the chili joint that Columbo frequents, a little harder to imagine Columbo getting tacos on the pier like Rockford.


2024 December 04 • Wednesday

It's always a pleasure to hear from internet friends who add to the pool of my favorite headlines, and Dmitrii has just reappeared after two years of movie watching with a whopping four additions!

Here they are in chronological order:


Confessions of a Nazi Spy (1939)


He Walked by Night (1948)


The Hitch-Hiker (1953)


Inherit the Wind (1960)

Thank you so much!
2024 December 02 • Monday

Vince Guaraldi is one of the giants of jazz piano. If you like Ahmad Jamal, you'll like Vince Guaraldi—although each has his own distinct style. You'll never confuse the two but they dwell in overlapping spheres.

While I never watched any of the animated Charlie Brown TV programs growing up, and didn't warm to them as an adult viewer, Guaraldi's music for them is absolutely sublime. When one of these records starts, everything else stops.

And so our 833rd Soundtrack of the Week, only a few days late to be right on the nose, is Vince Guaraldi's A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving.

This 50th Anniversary edition has some studio chatter in it, which will be the first thing you hear before the trio swings into "Charlie Brown Blues", an absolutely gorgeous piece that immediately lifted my spirits.

When you first hear the "Thanksgiving Theme" it's as an 11-second solo piano outing, followed by a longer jazz waltz version with Guaraldi playing acoustic and electric piano—at the same time on mutiple tracks. It's also beautiful. This might be the pinnacle of Charlie Brown music.

"Peppermint Patty" has a driving backbeat and Guaraldi's multiple keyboard lines—acoustic and electric piano as well as clavinet—breeze effortlessly above them. Each track sounds like the best track on the album.

Horns and vocals then join the trio for the funky "Little Birdie". Guaraldi does the singing ("Little birdie, why do you fly upside down? / What's amazing is the way you get around) while the horngs are courtesy of Chuck Bennett on trombone and Tom Harrell, who takes several impressive solos, on trumpet.

The lean and mean funk goes in a jazz direction for the brief "Thanksgiving Interlude" before the laidback funk/blues groove of "Is It James or Charlie?" gives some space to Guaraldi's impressive guitar playing. Quite the talented guy!

Of course the famous Peanuts theme has to be in here somewhere and you'll find a killer arrangement of it for the quintet in "Linus and Lucy".

There are some alternate takes, different mixes and bonus tracks as well, making this an essential record to have.